Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dark Laughter

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 23:08, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Dark Laughter


WP:FAKEARTICLE. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 19:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The information seems notable and accurate; I'm not familiar enough with the Creationism articles to say where this information belongs, but it should be Merged there. Achowat (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've taken a look, and this information appears to have simply been taken from Hindu_views_on_evolution, so merging is unnecessary. The page should be deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 19:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If all the information is present, it makes more sense to set up a redirect from that page to Hindu views on evolution. It might be a stale draft, but I like to err on the side of caution (that the user might come back to work on the article) and setting up a redirect (or even a soft redirect) serves to preserve the history if necessary and keep us from serving as a Web Host. Achowat (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The normal purpose of a redirect is to guide readers from a search term to a related article. I can't understand what the purpose of a redirect would be in this case. Readers aren't going to be searching for User:Dark Laughter because they want information about Hindu views on evolution. Dark Laughter has been inactive for nearly two years. Possibly he might one day return to work on that article, but his user page contains no useful information that is not already in the article, so nothing seems to be achieved by keeping it in any form. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * A solid argument, that; Deletion would be acceptable to me. Achowat (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.