Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Darthpineapple401/The one million dislike event

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. I note that usually the community gives some leeway for userspace drafts to be improved over time, but the WP:UP aspect of this draft overrode that in this discussion. --RL0919 (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Darthpineapple401/The one million dislike event
Also nominating: User talk:Darthpineapple401/The one million dislike event

User's personal screed on his hatred for Justin Bieber. Having a separate page on this violates WP:UP as "Extensive discussion not related to Wikipedia." &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 22:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Keep KoshVorlon  Naluboutes ''AeriaGloris 17:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated. Lovetinkle (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * On closer inspection, only the talk page is a pure rant/screed; the main page (the one with the User: prefix) appears to be a userspace draft of an article on something on YouTube that would be A7 fodder if it gets moved to mainspace. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 22:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; RHaworth 23:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. WP:NOTWEBHOST. --E♴ (talk) 00:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete both - Personal feelings about Justin Bieber notwithstanding, this is an outright violation of userpage policy.--WaltCip (talk) 16:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 01:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NOTCENSORED. Also, it's not HIS personal feelings, it's about an event, arguably a non-notable event, but an event nonetheless.    We also have wide latitude of what can appear on a webpage, it's not masquerading as a fake article either.
 * With respect, you appear to have misinterpreted Wikipedia policy. WP:NOTCENSORED generally applies to articles. For a more specific example of how this page is unsuitable, see WP:UP.--WaltCip (talk) 07:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.