Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davidnolen2151

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Davidnolen2151
Evangelization is not a proper use of user space, in my opinion. Drmies (talk) 04:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

The purpose is not evangelistic in nature. It's purpose is to share information. To publish an opinion as much as many very opinionated gossips on wikipedia.(Davidnolen2151 (talk) 04:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC))

Evangelize/evangelization is defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary 11th edition copyright 2006 as preaching to gospel in an effort to convert. My outline, which I shared, was in not preaching in a effort to convert anyone to Christianity. It was an informational piece attempting to share with those who might be able to use it. (Davidnolen2151 (talk) 04:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete Content totally unconnected to Wikipedia (WP:UPNOT), Wikipedia is not a web host (WP:WEBHOST), page not a viable article, editor is not an active editor outside the user page. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Duffbeerforme. WP:UPNOT would cover it, I think.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 03:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a free web host. MER-C 03:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.