Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dcole718


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete, obvious spam. Spike Wilbury ♫ talk  16:38, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

User:Dcole718
I am nomimating this page for deletion because I denied its speedy deletion under protest of another user. The concern was that it was spam. The page was tagged with the "NPOV" tag which does not apply to this namespace, and the reason for requested deletion was that it was obviously spam. My concern was that WP:USERPAGE suggests that userpages for users who have made beneficial contributions, especially new users should be given the courtesy of being asked nicely to tone down their autobiographical pages. WP:BITE applies. But the tag got readded twice, so it is evident that an immediate debate process will be required. JERRY talk contribs 06:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete' - Obvious spam created in October, created by a user whose only other contribution was in March. Clear violation of WP:CSD, for which WP:NOT is what actually applies. --Calton | Talk 06:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. per Calton. Spam spam spam spam... >< Richard  Ω6  12  11:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Spam egg spam spam bacon and spam. — Gavia immer (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.