Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dddccx

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Blank. Or "blanked", as it seems to be Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

User:Dddccx

 * Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

WP:NOTWEBHOST. The only edits of this user were to create this page. Hasn't edited since (over 5 years). Jayjg (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Interesting. They apparently joined Wikipedia before it was even created. CoolSkittle  (talk) 18:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Was about to be neutral, but it contains lies, as noted above. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Blank. Someone's test edits in a throwaway alt. account.  Old, never-viewed, slightly problematic userspace pages should be blanked.  Save MfD discussions for after an actual disagreement about the blanking.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Blanked As SmokeyJoe says, a throw-away account making a handful of edits five+ years ago does not need to be discussed unless someone wants to unblank the page. Johnuniq (talk) 10:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.