Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dead-Set/sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Dead-Set/sandbox


Wikipedia is not a web host for fake Survivor shows. U5 request was declined. Whpq (talk) 17:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is the sort of case WP:NOTWEBHOST is actually for - material not related to Wikipedia. A2soup (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I must admit, I just trusted the nom on this - the language barrier (and inability to go through all the Spanish survivor variants) kept me from checking if this is actually a fantasy show or an accounting of the actual show. If it is the latter, I would oppose deletion and favor blank+template as a good faith draft. A2soup (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Reality TV shows don't exist in a vacuum. At the very least, the show's web site will list the contestant's names, and one can find verification through the shows web site which can be found by googling for all of the contestant's names.  No such web site can be found.  There is no need to work through all of the Spanish language Survivor variants.  Furthermore, this is not the first time that this sandbox has been used for web hosting as you can see from the first deletion nomination.  The editor then tried to evade deletion by using a sockpuppet. -- Whpq (talk) 13:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds like you're right about the fantasy and I was correct to take your word for it. A2soup (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, page blanking would not be appropriate if you really think this is a real draft as this is not being nominated as a stale draft. This is recently created. -- Whpq (talk) 13:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, although it could be kept if the user explained what possible purpose in the encyclopedia it is associated with. Not U5-able as the user has a history of mainspace contributions.  Actual contributors remain entitled to an MfD review of their apparently nonsuitable userpages.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Abandoned userspace drafts that do not meet existing CSD criteria are harmless and can be safely ignored. 166.170.47.15 (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * This is not abandoned and not a draft. -- Whpq (talk) 11:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.