Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deghop/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Deghop/sandbox


There isn't anything useful this could be drafting, since we are not Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki. Per User pages, this doesn't belong here. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That page has one sentence and an empty infobox. Since the page is a user sandbox, this could have been handled by doing something as simple as leaving a notice on the user's talkpage and blanking the page if necessary. Master of Time   ( talk ) 02:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Agree with Master of Time. I have never seen the need to delete sandboxes at MfD - the entire point of sandboxes is for screwing around in because no one cares what's in them. It would be a much better use of everyone's time to just blank it with a notice, or even better, ignore it. Of course, it's a different story if there is advertising or especially BLP issues, but there is nothing at all like that here. A2soup (talk) 05:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. There is precedent here, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dylan620/1985 Planet Ceres Atlantic Hurricane Season. YE Pacific Hurricane  17:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.