Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Delicious carbuncle/RFC




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. The RfC has been filed. AniMate 16:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

User:Delicious carbuncle/RFC
Appears to be a tit for tat RFC/U about inflated issues of sourcing that have long since been addressed on the related article talk pages as well as previously unnecessarily escalated to ANI with no administrator interested in taking action. The page should be removed, immediately filed or be considered a pointless attack page. Ash (talk) 22:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC) — User:207.237.230.164 • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Okip   10:21, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep DC says he'll be posting the RFC/U within a couple of days. If it hasn't gone live within 7 days, then delete.Bali ultimate (talk) 22:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Though I agree with your reasoning, I voted to keep your Rfc/U of Dc (an item I wish would finally be completed and filed), and, as such, Dc has a right to try and prove his point here (despite how obviously based in revenge it may be). 207.237.230.164 (talk) 22:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I informed Ash that I would be filing this over a week ago. I have asked for comments from editors who were involved in the ANI discussion which prompted this and stated that it would be filed within the next day or so. I am at a loss to understand how this can be a "tit for tat" RFC/U since Ash has not filed an RFC/U (and in fact has refused to file the RFC/U they claim to have been preparing). Although it really isn't relevant to whether or not the page gets deleted, Ash appears to be putting forward arguments here which are the exact opposite of the arguments they put forward at the MfD I raised for their page. Incidentally, can someone close that MfD please - it's waaaay overdue. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Nomination intended as disrutive, posted only after DC stated his imminent intention to "go live." Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * And even though I voted "weak keep" here, I find it rather ironic that Dc made the same nom of Ash's RfC of them, in a lesser amount of time, posted only after Ash stated their imminent intention to go live. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What I nominated, troll, was an attack page that was nothing like an RFC/U filing. I withdrew the nomination when Ash stated they were intending to file it. A week later, when it was not filed, I nominated it again. I have urged Ash to file it, but they keep finding new reasons not to. You know this, but I don't want your trolling to be believed by those who don't. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Isn't it great when you can find ways to argue, even with those who are agreeing with you? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - Delicious carbuncle is incivil, a known liar, and disruptive to the community. This RFC is moot anyway.  One more bad move on his part, and he's getting a templated final warning from me. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting comments, Bearian, but rather inaccurate. (And a surprising attack coming from someone who, as an admin, really ought to know better.) Delicious carbuncle (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * He's just joking. It was April Fool's Day when his comment was posted.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 15:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you already recognise this Bearian but I guess it wouldn't hurt to remind you that you are far too involved in this case and clearly too emotionally invested to exercise any admin functions around Delicious Carbuncle. Cheers Spartaz Humbug! 05:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm going to assume Bearian's response was an April Fool's joke. Get the RfC posted and certified post-haste, I'm sick of the bullshit surrounding you and Ash. AniMate  02:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - marked as under construction.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 15:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as specific protected use in userspace. Collect (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The page was created very recently (two days before Ash nominated it for deletion), and the page is civil and within accepted userpage guidelines. Johnuniq (talk) 22:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I would have filed this yesterday, but I failed to take into account that it is a holiday in many parts of the world today and many editors are not active. There's no point in filing if it isn't going to get certified, so I will file it on Monday, unless someone declares that they are willing to certify it if filed earlier. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * File it or delete it DC, I'm tired of this and the sooner this dispute goes to DR the better. Since Ash no longer seems to be editing I suggest you just let it drop right now as they have, hopefully, exercised the primary form of DR which is disengagement. Spartaz Humbug! 05:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The RFC has little or nothing to do with any dispute Ash and I may have - it has to do with misuse of citations. Short of exercising their right to vanish, I have to assume that Ash may continue to edit. I don't think this is something that should be ignored or sloughed off as a personal conflict. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * delete per Bearian. I have seen some of the edit history of this editor. Okip  05:49, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * keep per Bali; file the thing, soonish. Jack Merridew 06:03, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Please see Requests for comment/Ash. Feel free to delete my preparation page and close this MfD. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.