Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Demeiz




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy delete, G4. JamesBWatson asked me to look at the possibility of closing this MfD as a G4. I've looked at the version previously deleted and this is just a severely cropped version of it; additionally it doesn't look like the user is working on improvements. If Demeiz wants to begin doing so, I'd be happy to restore the page. Olaf Davis (talk) 10:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Demeiz
Inappropriate copy/paste move of a deleted page, also violates GFDL. Mainspace/userpages are not intended as a means to circumvent deletion, Wikipedia is not a webhost, account appears to have been created for the purposes of vandalism and disruption anyhow... I can go on. JBsupreme ( talk ) 06:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Nucular powered Delete Copypasta, GFDL violation, editor not here in good faith, etc. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, very likely speedy delete. This is use of user space for a pseudo-article which would not be allowed in main space. I think it very probably qualifies for speedy deletion under  CSD G4 (Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion), in light of Articles for deletion/AdventureQuest Worlds, but not being an admin I can't see whether the article has been significantly changed. If any admin reading this would like to check, that would be helpful. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a pale shadow of what was in the article but does appear to be a verbatim unattributed copy of the lede, infobox, and bottom bits with all body text removed. Franamax (talk) 08:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that information, Franamax. That suggests to me it should be speedily deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.