Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deniswestower

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - no objection has been raised. Wily D 08:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

User:Deniswestower


Per WP:UP - promotion of viewpoint unrelated to Wikipedia. Also, the user's only edit, 04:05, 11 July 2011, was this user page, and the information is not needed to allow the user to better participate in the community and is not related to Deniswestower's Wikipedia work and activities.-- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC) P.S., I found the page via searching for danisnotonfire after participating in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Danosaurs4life, which appears to have promoted the 21 August 2012‎ creation of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/danisnotonfire Daniel Howell by new IP editor. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., this has nothing to do with building an encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.