Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dennette/Ancestry

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep both. —Cryptic 02:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Dennette/Ancestry


Personal ancestory info of user and an old essay. Clear WP:NOTWEBHOST issue CSD declined because Admin felt user had too many other edits to apply WP:U5. User last edited 5 years ago. Legacypac (talk) 16:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the "Ancestry" page. I don't see that this violates the "small and proportionate" clause of WP:UPYES. I will nominate User:Dennette/sandbox as an autobiographical fake article, though. VQuakr (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I also don't see that this violates the relevant provisions of WP:NOTWEBHOST, nor that it does any harm left in place. I gather that this is part of Legacypac's crusade continuing efforts to "clean up" userspace, efforts that have not attracted universal support. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I was the admin who declined the U5 speedy. The user's edit counts by namespace are Article:705 (48%); Talk: 189 (12.9%); User: 186 (12.7%); User talk: 161 (11%); and Wikipedia: 205 (14%). I don't think this constitutes as specified in U5, and I would expect an experienced U5 tagger to know that and check. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * indeed when I checked this user's editing history I missed there was more edits beyond their first page of edits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dennette which are, but for three exceptions, all userspace edits. My bad. I'm sorry for the bad U5.
 * Nothing attracts universal support at Wikipedia, including insulting of productive reviewers of unsuitable content and users that work the WP:ABANDONED wikiproject.


 * An exemption from content that has no relevence to Wikipedia as an extension of one's userpage may make sense here on his Genealogy table. User has not edited in 5 years though, so at some point the exemption gets thin.


 * I'm not pleased with the Nazi reference on the Ancestory page as, to the reader, it could seem he is validating he has no Jewish blood, though I assume he is just throwing out an interesting historical tidbit.
 * It is an unfortunate fact of history that the Nazis existed. As one who lost (distant) relatives to the Holocaust, I hold no brief for them or their modern apologists. I took the comment as a method of demonstrating how extreme their protocols to ensure "pure blood" were, a possible note for including in an article in future. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No one is addressing the Chess page also nominated, which is not connected to their userpage profile and appears to be just a long term

web-host thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Legacypac (talk • contribs) 20:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the chess page also. I missed that this is a multiple nomination, particularly because the nominator failed to put an MfD template on the Chess page, so i thought he had chosen not to nominate that page. The chess page has information that might well be useful in writing an article on computer chess algorithims, although it is nowhere near a valid article as it stands. But it is not "unrelated to Wikipedia's purposes" in my view. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.