Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dennisgaudenzi




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. @harej 23:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Dennisgaudenzi
Advertising. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 18:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This page is simply listing information about me if people were to Google me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennisgaudenzi (talk • contribs)
 * WP:NOTMYSPACE --3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 18:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment You really should not MfD a new user's page without first talking to them about it. Gigs (talk) 01:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep if he finds a way to contribute to the encyclopedia. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As per this, and the user's apparent lack of interest in Wikipedia, blank/delete. In general, it is best to blank such pages (borderline advertising by non-contributors) and not advertise further at MfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as the page in its current form reads like self-promotion, which is against Wikipedia's policies. If the page can be re-written to not be so promotional, then maybe it could be kept.  ArcAngel (talk) 08:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It is clearly intended to be an advertisement for the user's business. Why SmokeyJoe thinks that constructive users should be allowed to use Wikipedia as an advertising service I cannot for the life of me imagine. This is even more blatantly advertising than many articles which are quite rightly speedy-deleted under CSD G11, and I have proposed it for a speedy delete. If, however, it for some reason survives that, then surely it must be deleted here. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I hadn't considered it an advertisement. On reconsidering, the external link (disguised or not) should go.  However, if he becomes a serious wikipedian, then we shouldn't delete his userpage if editing could fix it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and don't slap an MfD on a new user before speaking to them about the problem first. We should act in good faith before listing a userpage here. -- Ja Ga  talk 15:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.