Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Diamantino Micic




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Tim Song (talk) 15:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

User:Diamantino Micic
User page of a de-indefblocked user, written like a WP article. Has been speedied and deleted on de multiple times, both under this name and under Dijamantino_Micic (with an additional "j"). Whether the German version is exactly the same as this I cannot see, though; this would need a de-Admin.

One could think the user mistook his user page for his sandbox, but in this case I really hesitate to WP:AGF. Pgallert (talk) 14:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE says, "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." (mine emphasized) This userspace copy has been created by a single-purpose account whose sole purpose is to promote the subject of the article; no other edits outside of this topic have been made from this account. This userspace draft of a previously deleted article about a non-notable individual violates the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST and should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The user isn't blocked on the English Wikipedia but may be blocked on the German Wikipedia. The article wasn't created here but at de:Dijamantino Micic; however, I believe that WP:FAKEARTICLE applies across all wikis. Cunard (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Per Tia's comment on my talk page this has also been deleted on the Italian WP. --Pgallert (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete This page does seem to exist solely to circumvent Wikipedia's guidelines that prevent it from existing in article space.  Peacock (talk) 16:24, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.