Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Digwuren/Petri Krohn's Story of Estonians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Mallanox at author's request. Resurgent insurgent 16:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Digwuren/Petri Krohn's Story of Estonians
Attack page Alex Bakharev 01:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * There's nothing attacky with such a compilation. You don't see me going around and tagging things such as User:Petri Krohn/Evidence for deletion. Digwuren 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. The nomination is baseless. Digwuren 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Upon deeply pondering on the issue, and getting advice from my socks -- both the left one and the right one --, as well as other stakeholders that will not be disclosed at this time, I have determined that to keep a compendium of weird misthoughts in such a respectable and well-accessible place as Wikipedia is undesirable. Specifically, it gives these delusions an undeserved aura of respectability.  It may also aid Petri Krohn in organising his thoughts, which is certainly a dangerous perspective.  Consequently, I have demolished the compendium into an undisclosed location that will be discreetly disclosed on a need-to-know basis. This renders the current discussion moot. Digwuren 12:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I would also like to point out that the consensus to keep is clear, well illustrating the baselessness of the original nomination. Digwuren 12:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


 * keep. Perhaps Digwuren sould rename it, i.e remove Petri Krohn from title. The satirical piece, however, should remain until mr. Krohn's campaign is allowed to continue.E.J. 07:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The satire part of it is actually not my primary intent. The project began many weeks ago, in the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn controversy, to provide a thorough and systematic view into Petri Krohn's ideas regarding Estonia and History of Estonia.  It only seems satirical because the views are so skewed.
 * I wouldn't mind extending the scope further, to include ideas of Roobit and Ghirlandajo, actually. They appear to be reasonably mutually consistent, and skewed in the similar manner. Digwuren 09:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * keep The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--Alexia Death 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. Suva 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as a matter of course. We will need this page during the prospective arbitration. I hereby request Digwuren to write about Ghirlandajo's Story of Estonians, preferrably starting a separate page about this clinical case of anti-Estonianness or whatever. --Ghirla-трёп- 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You have not displayed enough weird beliefs to warrant a full article about them, so I lack sufficient data. I'm afraid you're going to have to write your article yourself if you don't want to share your glory. Digwuren 11:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Petri Krohn has his own interesting page User:Petri Krohn/Evidence which is in my opinion even worse.--Staberinde 23:19, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's clearly an attack page; it relates a version of events, ascribed to another user, which is then mocked for being wildly inaccurate. It's not a good faith compilation of any sort of evidence, and is quite plainly a personal attack on Petri Krohn.  A compilation of evidence page, as Petri Krohn has, is acceptable -- this kind of editorializing personal attack on another user is totally unacceptable.  --Haemo 00:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Wtf, send this crap to mediation. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Petri Krohn/Evidence and this. -N 01:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Pages about user's conduct are helpfull. Those can be used in future dispute resolutions.--MariusM 02:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is an attack page. Neil   ╦  23:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.