Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Discasto

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Closed. MfD is not a venue to further editor disputes, and it appears that this nomination is part of a campaign of harassment, as evidenced by the groundless SPI helpfully linked to by one of Discasto's detractors. Gigs (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Discasto


WP:AGF, WP:POLEMIC. We should not have as a standing user page an open accusation of bad faith editing against multiple editors. Kahastok talk 22:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * In the last weeks, Kahastok has devoted most of his contributions to wikihound me. See his :
 * Claiming the wikipedia policies prevents me from wording and signing my messages in the way I wish
 * Trying to make me get blocked
 * Trying to enlist an admin to get me blocked
 * Reporting me in AN/U by this very same issue (with exactly no result)


 * As his complaint in AN/U regarding my user page was silently discarded, now he tries simply to get it deleted, thus escalating the wikihounding. I see this behavior as completely pointless and possibly the result of his friend WCM getting blocked in commons by disruptive behavior (in fact, immediately after extensively complaining in commons, he just come here and tried to have my user page deleted; it seems clearly sort of revenge)


 * May I ask Kahastok to stop harassing me? Thanks --Discasto (talk) 23:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * FTR I had this MFD written up before noticing that Discasto had tried (and succeeding) in playing the Commons system. The order in which I did things is irrelevant.


 * And it doesn't detract from the fact that this user page is clearly inappropriate - is it really harassment to object to editors acting in good faith being accused of "politically motivated censorship" on an editor's user page?


 * On the other stuff, I suggest readers read it - and my contribution history - for themselves and reach their own conclusions as to the accuracy and neutrality of Discasto's allegations. My impression was that the ANI failed primarily because it was initially about canvassing, so admins thought it was resolved when the discussion being canvassed finished.


 * Very interesting that Discasto does not attempt to rebut the substance of the deletion argument. Kahastok talk 09:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * There's no substance in your argument. You took my user page to AN/I and were totally ignored. So you keep on playing the WP:FORUMSHOPPING game. --Discasto (talk) 23:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Delete Attack page from an editor currently permanently banned on es.wikipedia for doing this sort of thing. Additional information may be found here Sockpuppet investigations/Ecemaml. WCM email 18:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, in fact I was banned for trying to avoid this kind of harassment from people like you to the ones they chose as victims. I'm very proud of that and would do it again. --Discasto (talk) 23:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.