Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DivinityFamily


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. User has blanked it anyway, so keeping this discussion open serves no purpose, especially in light of the clear consensus to keep. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 09:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

User:DivinityFamily
Spammy bio (possible autobio COI) Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  20:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - seems to be an article in the making. No obvious spam or COI issues that I can see - this wouldn't fall any under of our CSD criteria as an article, so I really don't think there's any grounds for deleting it from userspace. Terraxos (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Not an autobio (look at the birth and death dates), and not a hoax (look at this). Even if it were junk, I would still say keep, and add "it can get AfD'ed/speedied once it hits mainspace"; this, though, is a legitimate article that just needs cleanup. Polit i zer talk / contribs 06:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep (actually "mainspaceify" might be reasonable) meets all standards for start-up article in mainspace as far as I can tell, and deletion here is thus a non-starter. Collect (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Possible COI (not autobio) I should have said. Still in the wrong place. Award from his high school? Doubt it's gonna pass WP:N if it's ever properly mainspaced. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * True, there are notability concerns, but (like I tried to say above, although it came out a bit garbled, like most of what I do), that can/should be dealt with with a tag or an AfD if it comes to that; I don't think there's any need to take action on it while it's still in userspace. Polit i zer talk / contribs 19:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks like the new user needs some advice rather than deletion of their first effort. Even if it's not notable enough for mainspace (I'm not evaluating that at this point), there's nothing wrong with planning an article in user-space first. Maybe the user doesn't know about user sub-pages yet. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 04:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google search suggests that the subject was a notable literary figure in his home country. Rather than trying to delete the article, we ought to advise the editor to plan to move it to mainspace so it can be improved further. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * comment user has blanked page, moot point now I think. (but keep as far as the user page goes — Ched (talk) 09:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.