Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dkpintar/sandbox CH

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. — ξ xplicit  01:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

User:Dkpintar/sandbox CH
User admits on my talkpage that this line doesn't exist. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:12, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Interesting. If by "does not exist" they mean it isn't built yet but is planned, that would be one thing, but if they mean it simply does not exist at all and they made it up, then this is obviously not related to contributing anything positive to Wikipedia. In either event it has been languishing in user space for nearly a year without serving any purpose, so Delete as unrelated to Wikipedia/being a fake or a hoax. apparently it is neither of those things. Keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Upon further research, I realized that it is in the proposal stage. (Chelsea–Hackney line). A map already exists, so this is useless. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep As valid user sandbox. Not a hoax or the like, and likely to be useful for that user in the future. Collect (talk) 10:29, 20 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep per Collect -- SPhilbrick  T  00:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Test pages and experimentation are allowed.  EdEColbert  Let me know 06:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, acceptable use of userspace. Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.