Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DomRicco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. —Doug Bell talk 06:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

User:DomRicco
Recommend this page be deleted. It is the result of a userfication of an autobiographic article entry (at least it seems so from the user's talk page - an admin could confirm). The account has been around since April/06 and the only edits are to the user page and to upload his photograph. He has been given ample time to become a contributing member of the community and he has not. A failed autobiographical entry should not continue to survive simply because it was userfied instead of deteted.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not myspace. Should have been prodded. MER-C 02:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I did think of prod, but as it had been userfied, that implied to me that the contents had been through some form of deletion review previously (assuming speedy). Based on that reasoning, I did not think that a prod was the right way to go.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (Contr.) 02:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NOT a lot of things on that page. Not a webhost comes to mind too. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 05:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, self-promotion. - Mgm|(talk) 11:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.