Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Donauld/ Marketing in the digital age

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [speak] || 17:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

User:Donauld/ Marketing in the digital age

 * – (View MfD)

This draft has been abandoned for eight years and this is simply trash that has no chance of being published in the mainspace. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:26, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Editor came, left this turd, went.  Throw turd out.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep and blank - won't disagree with it being lousy content, however, being old or lacking potential aren't valid reasons to delete a sandbox as per WP:STALE. If seeing subpar pages in other people's userspace rankles someone, and that user is inactive, it is permitted to blank. MfD is for when would be problematic even if blanked. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this abandoned draft.Catfurball (talk) 18:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom; if the editor returns and wants it back (I don't know why they would), it can be returned. Britishfinance (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.