Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Donjuanvargas/Toche League

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

User:Donjuanvargas/Toche League

 * – (View MfD)

This has no chance of ever being published in the mainspace as this draft fails WP:NOTGUIDE. I also can't verify if this sport even exists because I can't see any mentions on Google. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nominator is reasonably asking whether this was made up. More importantly, abandoned since 2011.  When nominating stuff that has been abandoned by ghosts of users since 2011, please say so.  Do you have a query that finds crud that has been abandoned in draft space for eight years?  If so, thank you.  But please say so when nominating.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:20, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a pet project and the sport is indeed small, but i have organised leagues in Shanghai and Berlin. I didn't find in the Wikipedia:NOTGUIDE anywhere saying that if something didn't appear in Google it was forbidden. If it requires Alphabet's blessing, then search "Toche Song 10" in youtube. (can't put link here coz it's forbidden.
 * Keep - No valid reason for deletion given. Neither being old nor failing notability guidelines are valid reasons for deletion as per WP:STALE. If seeing subpar pages in other people's userspace rankles someone, and that user is inactive, it is permitted to blank. I don't know why anyone would need to do that, but MfD should only be used if it would be problematic even if blanked. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Changing to Delete on the basis of WP:NOT. Possibly qualifies for CSD. According to our guidelines, the age of the draft nor level of activity of the author cannot be sole rationale for deletion of userspace drafts, but hoaxes are out of scope. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 17:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this draft it has been abandoned for many years.Catfurball (talk) 18:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Per WP:NOTMADEUP. A hoax term. Britishfinance (talk) 16:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.