Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DougsTech/RFAreason (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

User:DougsTech/RFAreason


DougsTech has been banned for over 2 years. This essay of his no longer has any historic value that was stated in the prior MFD.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 05:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Keep, keeps from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DougsTech/RFAreason are still valid: Bulwersator (talk) 07:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * "Valid essay, nothing offensive, refers to an unresolved continuing issue (the difficulty/lack of recognised process for de-admining). Relevant to the users past contributions, which remain part of the project, even if the user is and remains indef blocked. (...) --SmokeyJoe[odp] (talk) 02:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)"
 * "it's linked to from several pages including archived RFAs. Graham[odp]87 05:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)" (links)
 * "We do not excise people from photos the way the old Soviet Encyclopedia did, I trust. Collect[odp] (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)"
 * "Keep I read this essay after he was banned, coming in to it from an RfA... so yeah, we should keep it. Gigs[odp] (talk) 03:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)"
 * What's odp?
 * Script button (fast reply) Bulwersator (talk) 19:11, 15 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Wikipedia related; no harm. jorgenev 18:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - There doesn't seem to be much point in getting rid of this. It is doing no harm, and it is still a valid essay.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep explains reasoning used by this user, which would still be valid, as the history fo Wikipedia determines where we are today. The page was not made in violation of ban, so banning is not relevant to this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.