Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Drbobmelamede

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete by. — xaosflux  Talk 03:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Drbobmelamede


Violation of WP:FAKEARTICLE. jps (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for all of the reasons. Not "all of the reasons given above". ALL OF THE REASONS. Period.
 * Seriously, though, there is no chance whatsoever that any good can come of this page; it is a fake article in user space, it is entirely OR and even if it were not OR it would be FRINGE, it's horribly written and horribly sourced, and belongs to a user that has literally never edited any other page and clearly isn't here to build an encyclopedia. MjolnirPants   Tell me all about it.  15:22, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - I personally don't understand the wiki policy on this, a user page is a user page, if someone uses it to make a "Fake Article", I don't see the harm. But that aside, it is clear that this page is in violation of WP:FAKEARTICLE. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for the rest of the reasons User:MjolnirPants missed. I'm going to tag it for speedy. Legacypac (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE and get back to editing. QuackGuru  ( talk ) 02:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.