Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dronebogus/Userboxes/CBT

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. The userbox is not transcluded anywhere, so potential damage done by deletion is minimal.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 16:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

User:Dronebogus/Userboxes/CBT

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Per WP:UP, you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute. I don't see any point to this userbox other than obnoxious puerile humour that's better suited to a site like 4chan or Reddit. Spicy (talk) 10:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Neutral. This isn't puerile jokes, and definitely won't bring the project into disrepute. It is literally just a copy of the first paragraph of an article. Neo-corelight (Talk) 12:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * But what's the point of taking that paragraph and sticking it in a userbox other than to say "ha ha, cocks"? Spicy (talk) 12:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Nothing. But this is someone's userpage and you need better reason other than "I don't like it". Neo-corelight (Talk) 12:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s a meme. There’s a whole account Twitter account dedicated to just posting random excerpts. Copypasta-ing the first paragraph of the CBT article in weird places is a common joke due to its oddness and awkward subject matter. If you don’t get the reference I can see why it comes across as puerile trolling. Dronebogus (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That said I replaced it with a more innocuous userbox representing the copypasta meme (that just uses the article on the subject) so I don’t really care what you do with this one. I was just trying to make a silly reference to an infamous bit of WP but if nobody gets it then it isn’t funny. Dronebogus (talk) 18:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC*'''
 * Neutral - I guess I'm just having a hard time trying to figure out what the point of this userbox is. Wikipedia as a medium, due to its exceptionally wide demographics, doesn't lend itself well to dumb copypasta memes that you commonly see on filth-breeding grounds like Discord or 4chan. --WaltCip- (talk)  13:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Funny meme (I remember seeing the Lego Yoda one a while back) but going to have to !vote delete because sexually explicit BDSM stuff on userpages is likely to make a lot of people uncomfortable given the strong association with sexual violence inherent to that, even if the userbox is done in a joking manner/not intended to be taken seriously. Though we did end up keeping an unironic tit torture userbox at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Biofase/Userboxes/Hurt you, so if this gets deleted we may need to re-evaluate other userboxes as well. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 23:25, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah I don’t have a problem with people just stating what they like in general terms but that ubx goes too far. Dronebogus (talk) 00:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I think that I am tolerant, and I agree that Wikipedia is not censored, but there is such a thing as a disgust factor. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.