Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DrunkenPirate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 14:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

User:DrunkenPirate
Absoutley Nonsense Nathannoblet 00:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per WP:NPA. And attacking the people who let you put something in their site is really stupid in the first place. Badbilltucker 18:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I know being an anon user my say doesn't count much, but why is this even up for contention? Where in WP:NPA does it say anything about the consequences for rude behavior (and if this user's behavior can be said as incivil then some of the people on this wiki must be debased barbarians in comparison) being user page deletion?  The fact that this is even up for debate is insulting.  This very page's existence is a personal attack on the user in question.  69.124.143.230 03:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete - This is nonsense. I thought Wikipedia was FOR free speech? All this is doing is reinforcing what is ON his page. Why are there moderators going around marking these things up for deletion? Can't they be doing something more productive, like improving articles? Living Ghost 04:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason is given for deletion by the nominator; using No personal attacks is ridiculous, as it doesn't attack anyone personally. zafiroblue05 | Talk 04:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. We normally give considerable latitude to editors-in-good-standing on their use of the userspace.  This appears to be routine venting by a relatively new user.  Give the user the benefit of doubt for now.  Rossami (talk) 21:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep User is entitled to his opinion, even if it means his first step is to burn his bridges with every admin. WP:NPA applies only if an individual has been personally attacked (it's helpful to actually read the policy you cite). I'd hope the admins have thicker skin than this. -- User:Malber (talk • contribs) 13:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Retracted vote and changed to delete per Jimbo on polemical statements. I'll also eat my words about reading policy. -- User:Malber (talk • contribs) 14:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Keeplol im sorry but what ever happened too free speach, no one person was attacked. second least now you know what people think, its better than not knowing ;). his page is hamless. be a man (or woman) and take it on the chinPTGshogun 16:01, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete We're here to write, not to whine. --InShaneee 22:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Account created in March, five edits since then. Delete, not a serious user.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  16:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.