Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dskaushik/Cashnetusa

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Dskaushik/Cashnetusa

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Quasi-advert, created eleven years ago, the last edit of an editor with 26 edits total. Wikipedia is not a company-directory information storage locker. Calton &#124; Talk 05:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Spam. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * G11 - if something in userspace is promotional enough to be deleted, it can typically be done through CSD. This spam (plus pro-payday loan dreck) would surely qualify. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 14:08, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plausibly, though unlikely, notable. Sourced.  This is good enough to keep indefinitely in userspace. G11 would not be valid.  Editorially blanking could be considered, but I would not even blank it.  It is _NO INDEX_ed, it will only be found by a Wikipedia. Looking for it.  SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep sure it's spammy, but it's not problematic even if blanked (see WP:STALEDRAFT). Blank if you must, and move on. There's endless reams of abandoned promotional junk in userspace but it's all noindexed and impossible to find, and the links are nofollowed and do nothing for seo. If we systemically went through all of it mfd would be completely overwhelmed, and to what purpose? Especially when there's so much poorly sourced quasi-spam in mainspace. If you want to use your time efficiently go start by cleaning out backlogs like Category:Articles with a promotional tone or Category:Articles with wikipuffery, and remember the articles in those are indexed and actually can be found. If you want to flood some place with deletion noms then flood afd where this actually matters. Not to be rude but this is WP:RAGPICKING. Regards, 31.41.45.190 (talk) 18:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and also rewrite into an encyclopedic manner or form if possible - if the company mentioned is notable for inclusion here. User:Ahthga YramTalk with me! I want to change my name! 05:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:RAG and Ahthga Yram. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this spammy WP:RAG. —  csc -1 04:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * We shall not actively search and list these, but since we are here: Delete, as an old abandoned draft. Yes, it does not hurt because it is not easy to find, but it also serves no purpose, not even helping to create a proper article because... it is not easy to find! - Nabla (talk) 16:00, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't do much harm in user space.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.