Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dtalbott/bio notes (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Dtalbott/bio notes


The associated biography has been deleted and this page therefore is beyond the remit of the Wikipedia project. It's referenced in external websites to attack Wikipedia editors. jps (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLEMIC and WP:UP. - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Appears borderline FRINGE. Judging FRINGE is always hard work. The AfD says FRINGE. I am inclined to trust jps. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: First nomination is at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dtalbott/bio notes. Note that participation was extremely small and that the rationale for deletion was different last time. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak DeleteYep.seems to violate what user pages are for, but not sure by that much.Slatersteven (talk) 14:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per jps and LuckyLouie. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Inappropriate, abandoned. I agree with jps and LuckyLouie. And yes, I think it's safe to call Talbott fringe.  Doug Weller  talk 18:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.