Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dwkob/example/indect

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn nomination. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  03:34, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Dwkob/example/indect
An abandoned article that I think fails notability. WP:NOTWEBHOST. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  08:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * as I see it, the article is within my namespace so what's the problem? --Dwkob (talk) 16:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, abandoned, yadda-yadda.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 00:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * My goodness! I need to pay more a ttention to the pages that I comment on. Switching to Keep.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:35, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Is this nomination a joke? This page was created less than two weeks ago. The article creator made his last substantive edit to it just nine days before the nomination. I wouldn't count a userspace draft as abandoned unless the creator had failed to edit Wikipedia at all (not just the particular draft page) for at least a year. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I would also note that this draft appears to be about a plausibly legitimate topic for an article (the project described has been covered in The Telegraph). This doesn't appear to be a draft for a hoax or attack page or anything that would deserve to get deleted immediately. So I don't understand the "non-notability" argument as applied here, either. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a valid use of userspace. Cunard (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep recent activity, appropriate use of subpage -- SPhilbrick  T  00:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.