Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EZRA FC

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:13, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

User:EZRA FC
Also User:Waxemmie

Not sure what's happening here, but we seem to have at least two users copying an article about a Thai football club, from Muangthong United F.C., to their user pages within minutes of each other - this one and User:Waxemmie (They also created copies at Waxemmie and EZRA FC, which are currently up for speedy deletion now deleted). Is this an abuse of user space of some kind? Kids trying to spam their favourite football team? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. I doubt this userspace copy is for drafting or otherwise constructive purposes. MER-C 07:47, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete although I'd like to create a legit article with the data they provided. While their blocking is sound by policy, I wish there had been some attempt to communicate with them before doing that. Shiva   (Visnu)  14:45, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * There already is a legit article, Muangthong United F.C. - it's where these two copied it from (sorry if I didn't make it clear - I'll update my comments, above) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry! I guess I'm still half-asleep :) Shiva   (Visnu)  15:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete both WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion. Because these pages violate WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, they should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 00:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and other editors. Drmies (talk) 16:38, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.