Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:E dog95/Toddst1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete--Aervanath (talk) 04:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

User:E dog95/Toddst1
This is somewhere between a WP:Coatrack and an Attack page that contains quite a few half-truths (at best) from this inactive editor. I would direct editors to this archived WQA discussion for a more balanced interpretation from several editors. I wouldn't care except this is the #2 result that shows up when googling my username. Toddst1 (talk) 14:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete process should be handled at Wikiquette_alerts as mentioned above.  Not clearly an attack, but leaving this page lying around is a problem. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the user has been "absent" since before the original WQA filing. Leaving a page of half-truths and undebated discussion/accusations is not appropriate ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 15:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for a couple months -- absence for all of three months is not specifically an abandonment of WP. With 19K edits, I suggest the user qualified as "active" and merits some benefit of the doubt. Collect (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Then you won't mind if Toddst1 edits out his name from the page? Unfounded/unproven accusations that are not able to be debated have no place on Wikipedia, anywhere. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 11:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * AFAICT, Toddst1 is free to do so -- though I would suggest he just delete a couple of characters which would ensure it would not come up on a Google search for his name. I am unsure that it up to us to define exactly how founded any accusation is, and I would prefer that it be kept that way.  Collect (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)  Note I am implicitly saying the page can be essentially renamed to one minus those characters as well. Just wished to be clear. Collect (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per Bwilkins and Graeme, problematic page full of half truths and accusations. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 12:39, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.