Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Echoes134/Hidden!

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 19:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Echoes134/Hidden!
WP:NOT, just a nonsense userpage from an editor who had like 3 namespace edits and didn't edit since 2008 Delete Secret account 18:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Since the user is inactive, with barely any contributions.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 22:28, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete The arguments for deleting secret pages are summarized in the essay Why secret pages should be deleted. WP:UP states that examples of unrelated content to writing an encyclopedia are "Games, roleplaying sessions, secret pages and other things pertaining to "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia". Such activities are generally frowned upon by the community. Facetious games of no educational value relevant to the project are routinely deleted at MfD." WP:NOTMYSPACE states that "[t]he focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." To the creator: in a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34), community consensus was that the policy What Wikipedia is not does prohibit secret pages. The deletion of this page is not a reflection on you; instead, it is a reflection of the changing community consensus that secret pages set an inappropriate ethos at Wikipedia. In that policy discussion, I wrote here about why all secret pages should be treated equally; whether a user social networks or does not social network on Wikipedia has no bearing on the fact that all secret pages should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 23:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Begone secret page.-- SPhilbrick  T  02:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - It doesn't have anything to do with Wikipedia. Clementina   talk  07:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Cunard. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  18:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Apparently abandoned (over two years inactivity) and clearly not entitled to any leeway for established and productive editors. Delete per WP:UP. — Becksguy (talk) 09:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.