Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Edward Bower/temp

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Edward Bower/temp


User long gone, page is a copy of many articles cobbled together in a rough table, no reason to keep.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Content forking should only be done on short timescales and for defined purposes, otherwise it disrupts preferred copyright compliance.  Also delete per its title ("temp") and its age.  I don't think that the two editors or reverted the blanking of the page did so for good reason.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, an editor who's been gone for more than four years doesn't need "temp" pages. Nyttend (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  22:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.