Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ef1500/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Ef1500/sandbox


Frivolous submission to AFC by user who has since been indeffed as WP:NOTHERE for vandalism. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete A single-word test edit in a sandbox by a now-indef'ed user ... I'm a bit surprised to find there is no Speedy category that catches this. Meters (talk) 18:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:BITE.  User sandboxes are the proper place for test edits.  Deleting user sandboxes for no good reason is very rude.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As not needed now that the User is blocked. did you not see that Ef1500 has been blocked indefinitely, so your comment that it "is very rude" does not make any sense. JMHamo (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Many good editors began as vandals. What goes around comes around.  Be kind and AGF.  This sandbox page can be left alone.  OK, WP:BITE may not be held to apply here.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'd agree with if the page in question contained ANY even vaguely recent content that had any possibility of becoming an article.  The page says "happy :)".  It's not bitey to delete a page that only contains "happy :)".  It IS possible that this editor might be unblocked eventually, but I don't think they're going to miss "happy :)". Chrisw80 (talk) 04:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, but it is a sad thing that we have to delete "happy :)". Could we replace it with something else?  There is no WP:HAPPY.  WP:HAPPYPLACE is sad.  Maybe redirect to Happiness, that page made me feel a lot more happy than the page before.  An alternative solution, which I just did, is to remove the test / misused AfD template.  (Why it said "do not remove" when it obviously should be removed, I don't know.)  http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/x/word-happy-written-sand-24049717.jpg  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:45, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.