Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Egjackson




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Doesn't quite rise to the level of blatant spam, user appears to have worked on it recently. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Egjackson
SPA's userspace duplicate of a possible spam article in article space. See also Articles for deletion/Packers Plus Energy Services‎. Psychonaut (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep No rule against having draft material in userspace. Assertion of "SPA" may, in fact, mean "any relatively new user" which most of us were, once.  Does not appear to be spam. Collect (talk) 13:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.