Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ekips39/sandbox/2

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:09, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

User:Ekips39/sandbox/2


Per WP:POLEMIC: "The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner". This hasn't been touched for two years and I would hope the interested parties have some faith in the active editors not being terrible, horrible, no good, very bad sockpuppets. Pinging, who is still around I believe. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 06:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Creator is inactive for nearly a year now, low likelihood of a dialogue about this. bd2412  T 00:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. This page is a draft of the analysis that was posted in the SPI I initiated at the time of the incident. The author should have requested the deletion of this page shortly after that, but it sounds like they have lost interest altogether.  Lynn (SLW) (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.