Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Elaragirl/a Nomination 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy close, bad-faith nomination by vandal (now blocked)

User:Elaragirl/a
This is really unencyclopediaic. What is the point of a page that declares its uselessness, and then uses profanity to argue said point? OK, Wikipedia isn't censored, but this is over the top. I feel that Elkman was right in the original nomination in saying that it is a WP:POINT violation, or at least silliness. Eriqwerty123 21:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.