Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Emana/Obituary

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy deleted as inappropriate nonsense. A broader discussion of what the heck was going on here may be in order, if this was more recent blocks would probably be in order. --Beeblebrox (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

User:Emana/Obituary

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

I have been reading this over and I don't think this is real. I cannot find any reports related to the content. I personally don't believe "Christian propaganda" is something that would come across someone's mind if they are Chinese. It would be disrespectful to have a story that cannot be verified suggesting that a user is dead. 0x Deadbeef 18:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete A hoax about someone's murder is unacceptable on Wikipedia. TS might need to be called too.2601:647:5800:1A1F:BCD7:22B:B8B7:CD47 (talk) 19:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't know what Pandaflex thought they were doing; editing Emana's user page to add a Deceased Wikipedian tag without a reliable source, and then cryptically linking to this subpage in Emana's user space, which was totally inappropriate for them to have created.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm somewhat suspicious this is part of some wider fake activity. Emana's talk page has a bunch of comments from PMShop which feel like a creative writing exercise. The content removed by this diff as well https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emana&diff=290670777&oldid=268636761 also feels like badly written dialogue. For example: "Ah yes, you've noticed. Don't worry, I haven't hacked your network. I'm just monitoring the traffic off of your IP pool so I know when you're online so we can chat. So, if you're not in default, that leaves only one other company... wait, are they in default with you?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaggedHamster (talk • contribs) 22:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * More at User talk:PMshop. I feel like they are coordinated and are making up fictional stories on Wikipedia. I am slightly concerned that this wasn't picked up for over 13 years. 0x Deadbeef 04:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I also saw some edits to the user page where Pandaflex repeatedly reverted edits from an IP. I can see a possibility that the IP is actually the user because they did so in their first edit. 0x Deadbeef  03:52, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think Pandaflex is definitely a part of this creative writing group as can be indicated by this. 0x Deadbeef 16:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it looks like User:PMShop, User:Emana, and User:Pandaflex were doing some sort of bizarre meatpuppetry. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:443C:9603:3623:E956 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.