Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman/WWSInfoBox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:55, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman/WWSInfoBox


Orphaned unused sidebox for World War I. I think the same policies behind WP:UP would apply to portions of a draft page like this. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Analogy to WP:UP makes a lot of sense here, especially given the "template" content is content to be displayed in articlespace, rather than purely a navigation aid. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 19:11, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Properly attribution in the creation edit summary, the user deserves some credit for that. Redirect to the source.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not good enough. Consider the second edit to the page, which said that the page was a copy of another template... which has since been deleted. The attribution hazard just isn't present right now. It may be present in the future. UP:COPIES is cut-and-dried that it should be deleted. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 00:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, 2nd edit, delete now that we are here. However, navboxes are not a big issue because they do not contain copyrightable creative content. So it is a lesser than a WP:UP#COPIES issues. Copyrights is important, but copyright hysteria detracts from it. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I think WP:UP applies. Legacypac (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * How so? The images are licenced suitably for userspace. There are no mainspace categories. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Categories and templates intended for other usage, in particular those for articles and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.