Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EmonyRanger/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

User:EmonyRanger/sandbox

 * – (View MfD)

Old polemic about the article on Lena Dunham from a long-gone user. Wikipedia userspace isn't for ranting about not getting your way with an article. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 04:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLEMIC. Not purpose of user space. Johnuniq (talk) 05:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ranting about not getting your way with an article should be strictly limited to talkspace. – Levivich 05:17, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nom. User space is not for ranting about old article disputes. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment @The Blade of the Northern Lights I see you have finally found my lair since early August - MfD space! Newshunter12 (talk) 07:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Heh, nice. Glad to see you again! The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 13:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator and others. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLEMIC. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this useless rant by a confirmed sockmaster. -Crossroads- (talk) 05:50, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.