Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Endlessdan/CLAN IN THE FRONT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Greeves (talk • contribs) 14:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Endlessdan/CLAN IN THE FRONT
Blog about Wrestiling Samuell Lift me up or put me down 20:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Although it might have been prudent to simply warn the user (which I am sure they are aware of) WP:NOT.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 22:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC) . Closer inspection of said subpage indicates that it is in fact not a blog, although it read like one. Changing to Keep. The nominator (and others, like myself) should have paid closer attention.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 19:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * F U It's not a blog, richard. Its a means of communication between a novice Wiki user and myself. He copied some text that I asked to use in an edit of a wrestling related article. --Endless Dan 22:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you're going to go so far as to make a personal attack to prove a point, at least go right out and say it instead of conceal it in some thinly-veiled abbreviation (and don't say "I was talking about Kung Fu!").
 * I was talking about Kung Fu.
 * And don't stuff beans up your nose either.--WaltCip (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and per Coredesat.--WaltCip (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Keep per consensus.--WaltCip (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT, WP:NOT, there seems to be no indication that that this will be useful in any way. Editors matter, but this is a pretty blatant violation of WP not being a webhost. --Core desat 00:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think Dan is right to be frustrated on this one.  If you look at the history of the page, you'll see that the information actually was posted on there by a new user who is trying to get involved in the Wrestling WikiProject.  He's violating NOT#WEBHOST?  Because he's communicating with a new user who didn't format his post in Wikitext?  Give me a break.  Let's let Endlessdan help a new user out, and get on with working on an encyclopedia. --JayHenry (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Amen. This is the petty stuff that makes me less and less inclined to contribute to Wikipedia. --Endless Dan 17:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per above, it's just a sandbox Samuell Lift me up or put me down 21:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it is partly a talk page and some off topic stuff - but not really a blog. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, harmless. More talkpage than blog.  Actually, I believe portions of this were already attempted to be MfD'd, and kept.  I'll do a bit of research, I could be mistaken... Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I was mistaken. It was a separate usersubpage that was MfD'd.  The result was speedy close because E-dan was blocked at the time of nomination and couldn't respond. (which, remembering the sitch, was probably a good thing.)  After the block expired, E-Dan then wisely did a db-author on it (and I deleted it).  My Keep opinion above still stands for this unrelated nomination.   Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - harmless, not so large that it would be disruptive. Bearian (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.