Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Enforcer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep, and fairly strongly, too, since this is the sole real record of the block. Xoloz 13:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Enforcer
This user has been indef blocked (see the old block log) and has made nothing but legal threats during his/her tenure at WP. What reason is there to let this legal threat-filled page stay? Scobell302 03:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, if this page goes, so should the talk page. Scobell302 03:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Note that Jimbo has made a comment on that user page. Derex 03:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: This page was previously discussed at Votes for deletion/UserEnforcer.  The decision at the time was to "keep".  Rossami (talk)
 * Keep per the arguments made in the previous debate. This page provides evidence of the dispute and previous behavior and has been useful in finding sockpuppets of the banned user.  Because this user's ban predates the Special:Block log and for some reason does not show up in the manual listings of blocked users, this page is the only concrete evidence we have of the block.  By the way, I would have no objection to blanking the pages with one of the blocked-user templates.  Just preserve the page history in case we need to reopen the investigation.  Rossami (talk) 20:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.