Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:English102group

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

User:English102group


Essay developed as some kind of classwork by a group of students. No potential for becoming an article (topic is already covered by an existing article, and the added material is OR). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:WEBHOST. User should also, probably, be blocked per WP:NOSHARE. Achowat (talk) 14:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree that it is not suitable for addition to mainspace, in whole or in part, although the authors may feel that it was a good attempt.  More likely, this is a group effort at an essay for a purpose unrelated to Wikipedia.  Accordingly, refer them to Alternative outlets.  The user is appropirately blocked for being a role account.  The authors must have separaate accounts if they wish to continue at Wikipedia.  The authors should copy the content during this week of discussion, and after that may ask an administrator to email the deleted content.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.