Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Enkyo2/Sandbox-Fukue

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Enkyo2/Sandbox-Fukue


Sandbox of indef-blocked user, no future purpose. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weird content. I smell a kook.  Blocked for "persistent uncollaborative behaviour, failure to communicate constructively".  Generally, I think blocked users' userpages should only be blanked, so that non-admins may review evidence related to blocks, and to hold open the possibility that the blocked user might reform (it has happened) and return to do something sensible with their weird-looking stuff.  Not that I have ever even heard of an admin going off the rails and blocking unjustifiably without there being an immediate drama-storm.  This has no future purpose.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. User in question was a prolific (and sometimes prolifically bad) editor who could not interact with any other user without writing a novel.  The page in question is just leftover crap he was drafting for a future argument with someone.  He's now blocked indefinitely after having been blocked/topic banned/put on probation many times in the past.  Content is garbage; it should go. Bueller 007 (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.