Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Entropy7/glutathione supplements

User:Entropy7/glutathione supplements

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. I'm going to go out on a limb here and close this one using WP:Deletion process as a guide. JulieSpaulding (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Userfied deleted material, not under active editing. -- Tim Vickers (talk) 03:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep New. Real editor. No reason to delete from userspace. How can you judge "active editing" at the three day mark? Collect (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Collect. Hi878 (talk) 00:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has only just arrived for work, at least give it a year to be enhanced. The topic itself sounds as if there could be an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Quite true, since the current material is a POV fork of Whey protein, which is indeed an article. Tim Vickers (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete if the user doesn't explain what he is doing. New articles should not be made this way, by forking.  The title not reflecting the content is a bad sign to start with.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.