Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eric444/Sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Eric444/Sandbox

 * – (View MfD)

Archived chart positions from Radio & Records Canada Country chart. This was done back in 2016 to circumvent the fact that said charts were on WP:BADCHARTS due to their positions not being archived, which makes it a WP:NOTWEBHOST violation. The user stopped editing in late 2016 and has not touched these subpages since. Most of the charts containing these positions have since been archived, so these positions no longer serve any purpose, and their archival seems even more of a WP:NOTWEBHOST violation given that the positions are available now. Last AFD was closed as "keep" since Eric444 was still editing and the positions truly weren't available online, but as it stands this is considerably closer to violation and far less necessary to keep than it was previously. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - We don't need abandoned data from departed editors that is unlikely ever to be useful. If there isn't a guideline or essay that calls for the deletion of voluminous abandoned data, then there should be one, or we should use common sense.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. This data could also be wrong and we would never know. Britishfinance (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * We would know since the chart positions are largely if not entirely archived. Still makes it a WP:NOTWEBHOST. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh, I thought that the above was the only source. My bad, however, still of little use to WP. Britishfinance (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete all per above. No possible use, thus webhosting. -Crossroads- (talk) 02:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. There really is no need for this and some info (based on my research of the R&R charts) is indeed incorrect. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 08:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Disagree with these pages being called a NOTWEBHOST violation.  There are numerous valid purposes, and they match the editors contributions.  I'd recommend blanking if unsure, but I am confident that User:TenPoundHammer is probably right.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.