Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Eric Kvaalen/timeline of the future

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete.  Super Mario  Man  ( talk ) 03:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Eric Kvaalen/timeline of the future


User page that looks like an article but was deleted content, kept on the servers "so that I can look at it when I want." Remove per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. LuckyLouie (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOTAWEBHOST - The user can keep copies of things he/she wants to look at on his/her own computer or make a printout. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep No I can't. I can't look at it on my own computer and I don't have a printer. This short "article" is not bothering anybody. It's true that it uses a few hundred bytes of Wikipedia's storage, but just notifying me on my talk page of the intent to delete my little, hidden backup entailed storing a whole new copy of my talk page, which is several thousand bytes. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 06:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * User has blanked the page. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * It's tough that you don't have your own computer or a printer, but you can't use Wikipedia as a free webhost. Delete. BencherliteTalk 17:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)`
 * Delete per NOTWEBHOST, Just because your pc/printer doesn't work doesn't mean you're automatically allowed to keep deleted articles.... →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  21:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The longer this goes on, the more of Wikipedia's precious storage space gets wasted (even if you succeed in deleting the page), and the more people waste their time on this stupidity. Yesterday I replaced this private page with something else. In case anyone is curious to see what the offending article was, here's a link to archive.org: . Eric Kvaalen (talk) 04:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Banging on about storage space and how this is stupid won't help you at all..... You hadn't edited the page in 4 years so you clearly don't give that much of a shit about it lets be honest!, I suggest you quit the tantrum and concentrate on building the project like everyone else. —Davey 2010→  Talk to me 04:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll say one more thing before I shut up and stop wasting my time on this. I tried to "build the project" when I started this article on Wikipedia (not as a subpage to my user page). But certain people took it upon themselves to kill it. I don't know what their motivations were – I suspect some of them didn't like what it said about climate change or something. They managed to kill it, and recently someone else tried to start an article on the same subject but had to use a different title! Those people weren't interested in building the project, but in killing articles that they could kill by invoking various Wikipedia rules. Check your motives, folks. When you were born, God didn't tell you to enforce Wikipedia rules. You choose to do that for your own motives. (And your motives are certainly not to save Wikipedia storage space.) He did command you to love others and to make peace. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 05:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:OTHEROUTLETS. I keep a list of wizard cards and locations for the PS1 game Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets here at the Harry Potter Wiki and has his own wiki; there is nothing stopping you from creating one of your own. I have a similar problem; it's not an excuse.--  Laun  chba  ller  19:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.