Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Evergreen678/UNE16

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep per WP:CSK #1: withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

User:Evergreen678/UNE16

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

abandoned draft MB 06:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn MB 01:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:STALE and WP:RAGPICKING. No need to list such pages here. —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 07:00, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and blank if you must, but no PAG based reason for deletion has been supplied. If a userpage is speediable then tag it for speedy. If you think the current content is an issue, blank it. If the page is not speeidable and the content is problematic even if blanked  then and only then should an mfd be initiated. That means there must be a clear reason to conceal the history. Using mfd to clean the userspace of others is not productive, and yes I am repeating myself. as in the other nom you have failed to advance a reason for deletion in your statement making this arguably a speedy keep under WP:SK. Doing this en masse is disruptive and a waste of your fellow editors time, as I get time I'll go check on your other noms, but if they're all similar to this I strongly suggest just withdrawing them and reviewing the PAGs that govern mfd. Regards, 81.177.3.8 (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.