Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Evinatea/Sockpuppetry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 12:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Evinatea/Sockpuppetry
The subject has requested that this page gets deleted as it's been showing up on his name search for 2 years now. Jrod2 (talk) 18:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I really don't know what to make of this, Is this user admitting to doing Sockpuppetry, or are they feeling sorry for a user. What?? - Marcusmax ( speak ) 01:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Answer - Nothing of the sort. The bottom line is, the subject (E.V.) was never even an editor at WP. The whole thing was the result of a newbie's misunderstanding of the editing rules (me) which was exploited by a confirmed sock-puppeteer going under the name "Mike_Sorensen" and who engaged in making libelous comments and false accusations (to divert the attention from himself). Thanks for your attention. Jrod2 (talk) 18:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment has been added, which hopefully will fix the problem. -- Ned Scott 03:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - This user subpage was created in March 2007 to allow User:Evinatea to prepare a report for posting at Suspected sock puppets. As posted by Omegatron in March 2007,"'Moved from Talk:Audio mastering. Article talk pages are not the correct place to make accusations about sockpuppetry, and Evinatea's comments were severely disrupting the talk page. The correct place is Suspected_sock_puppets.'"The page was last edited by Evinatea on -25 March 2007. Under WP:UP, "Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided the dispute resolution process is started in a timely manner." Since it has been a year and a half since Evinatea's last edit the page, the "timely manner" grace period has passed and this page should be delete. -- Suntag  ☼  13:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - okay then delete. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 20:40, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Stuff that turned out that be incorrect and is affecting the real life of a real person? Oh, dude. Nuke this under WP:IAR and WP:BLP and let's go back to writing an encyclopedia :-/ --Enric Naval (talk) 01:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Blanking would solve the nominator's problem.  There's a lot of material in the history.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily if possible. This page was created for bad-faith reasons, and is apparently harming someone in real life; and it's of little historical use now. Blanking would be an alternative if the history were worth preserving, but I'm not honestly sure that it is. Terraxos (talk) 02:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.