Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fahad bangash/Fahad khan




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  no consensus to delete. delldot  &nabla;.  00:12, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

User:Fahad bangash/Fahad khan
Content here is being copied over to Malhoo, such as this shows. User is constantly promoting himself on Mahoo and other Pakistan related articles through both this account and IP sockpuppets. This page is only being used to serve that purpose. Netalarm  talk  02:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Acceptable userpage for a contributor, but advise the editor that he may not add himself to the article on his village. Also advise him to read Avoid peacock terms.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The user has been advised multiple times for his actions, from as early as February 2009 (or even earlier). He's just copying content from this page onto the article, and not using this as a userpage. I have also sent emails to this user regarding their actions, but have not received as responses. Netalarm  talk  02:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I see. I also see that you are a bit tense.  I'd prefer not to see his userpage deleted, although it could be effective in giving him the message.  I think it is better to block the user.  Hopefully, we won't have to block all of the IPs that he uses.  Relax, you will get support in dealing with this tenditious editor.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:03, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * =D. I'm keeping cool. Thanks for your concern. Netalarm   talk  03:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Extensive personal info unrelated to the user's activity as a Wikipedian. Wikipeda is not a free webhost and if the user wants to maintain a personal webpage, he should do so somewhere else. Nsk92 (talk) 10:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As generally acceptable. Deleting userpages is not, in general, the most effective way in dealing with anyone at all, hence agree with SmokeyJoe here as well. Collect (talk) 12:59, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Borderline case. The WP:NOTWEBHOST argument is a bit of a stretch, and while the "excessive personal information" argument is more applicable, I think this is ultimately an acceptable use of a userpage. Advise the user per SmokeyJoe. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 06:25, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Generally acceptable but this content is being used abusively (to move things to mainspace) and was in mainspace categories which made it a WP:FAKEARTICLE. This second problem was fixed. the first problem is behavioral and I find removing the source content of a behavior problem as an acceptable outcome. Miami33139 (talk) 18:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The disruption doesn't seem to be continuing. Close this and watch.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.