Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fang 23/userboxing/Anticapitalism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

User:Fang 23/userboxing/Anticapitalism

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This is an obvious breach of WP:SOAPBOX. Being a critic of capitalism myself, I believe that there are far appropriate ways to express that, instead of userboxes like this one – too long and composed like a preach. Sundostund (talk) 00:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * So--you don't like it? Drmies (talk) 00:36, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That's not the reason why I nominated it. WP:SOAPBOX is something that stands regardless of our personal tastes, and this userbox is breaching it. —Sundostund (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, there are other userboxen that serve the same or similar purpose without being so preachy. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 01:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant to User:Lenerd/anticapitalista which basically says the same thing without being too preachy. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Userboxes are allowed a certain amount of soapboxing, not much, and this is not TOO much, just annoying. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Inoffensive user opinion that says something about the user.  Redundancy is not a reason to delete. “Preachy” is a subjective criticism and not a reason to delete a userspace opinion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, This is skirting on the edge of userbox content restrictions but not necessarily a blatant violation. Highly recommend a less politicised rewrite. Rob3512  ( Talk ) 10:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - same reasons as at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Apollonius 1236/userboxes/Socialist &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 15:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep not very aggressive in its point, so I say it doesn’t fail WP:SOAP by current standards which are very generous to potentially controversial opinions in userspace if they’re delivered briefly and civilly. Dronebogus (talk) 21:18, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. This is perfectly inoffensive and nonaggressive, and should be allowed as a personal freedom of expression. David A (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Really this an unoffensive expression of one's political opinion, perfectly suited for use on someone's personal page. There is nothing here to warrant a delete, a personal point that one finds this "preachy" doesn't mean anything, and is not a basis for deletion. One should only delete a userbox when the content should not be on anyone's page if it is disgusting, unacceptable or repulsive, as an example no one would state that this text in plain form should be deleted from a page as it's simply a position. Des Vallee (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.