Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Fcbcampnou/Rogue Vandal: A Wikipedian Story

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:48, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Fcbcampnou/Rogue Vandal: A Wikipedian Story

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Per reasons listed by nom at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:JulieMinkai/Planning_for_seventh_Wikipedia_movie. It’s been stated multiple times that this should be bundled with that one because of multiple “delete all” votes but since I barely know how to do that and nobody else is doing it I’m individually nominating this and all the others. Dronebogus (talk) 12:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, per my comments at the other MfDs in this series. Jokes are not serious, but they are important. jp×g 21:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This clearly constitutes writings [...] not closely related to Wikipedia's goals (quote from User pages), and thus not an acceptable use of userspace. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep and Remove names of anyone who objects, because otherwise why should we care about some goofy sandbox page? If this were created by someone WP:NOTHERE (which does happen with this "humor" content sometimes), then I'd probably suggest deleting, but it's just a bit of goofiness in userspace, where one is allowed to be goofy, experiment with wikicode, collect userboxes, be part of the Wikipedia community, etc. as long as you're otherwise here for the right reasons. WP:UP specifically links to Category:Wikipedia games, of course, which has all manner of silly stuff that doesn't really have "educational value", yet some manages to find a home in projectspace. It seems like fine practice not to include the names of users who object and/or banned users who cannot object, and it certainly shouldn't depict anyone in a negative light without proactive consent, but otherwise, what is the deletion rationale for this vs any other "asdfasdf" sandbox? &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 15:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * BLP Comment I read thru some of these, don't give a crap if they stay or go, but this one caught my attention. I know Sanger is persona non grata around here, but this one seems to mock him in Scene 3. Is satire a BLP violation? The closet I could find was WP:BLPTALK. Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 10:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Larry Sanger is an occasionally active editor in good standing. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * As he is a founder and the author of many Wikipedia policies, it is appropriate to have Sanger in a fun project reflective exercise SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * He’s also a notoriously divisive figure due to his sometimes downright bizarre criticisms of Wikipedia and support of right-wing nonsense like transgender bathroom scaremongering, anti-masking and opposition to COVID vaccine mandates. His last non-userspace edits were over 2 years ago and consisted of borderline uncivil comments on talk:intelligent design and some afd for The Next Web. IMO he’s only in “good standing” due to his extremely low activity, fan club, and local celebrity status. Dronebogus (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I was not aware he was still able to edit with his account. I guess that puts him in the same boat as the others on these pages: As Rhododendrites !votes above, if he objects it's up to him. Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 18:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Project related reflection. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.